[Normally I'd post this sort of thing to twitter, but 140 characters ain't enough.]
I’m a huge Nate Silver fan. I feel that quantitative analysis (especially statistical analysis) is sorely undervalued and underutilized in all aspects of the contemporary world and I love that his work has more people thinking about it. I’ve followed his work since the early days of the 2008 election and have done everything I can to popularize it. So you can imagine how elated I was when he gained the backing of the New York Times. His audience and resources were instantly increased exponentially.
I’ve never read the New York Times before. So I wasn’t familiar with their “Mr/Ms” policy. Basically, people aren’t referred to by their last names, as is standard practice in nearly every other form of expository writing. A “Mr” or “Ms” MUST precede every last name. This bothers me a lot, for two reasons.
First, it makes the writing read far stodgier than it needs to. This matters. I get the concept of journalistic register. I also get the concept of connecting with your readers. Maintaining an archaic style that your contemporaries have done away with accomplishes nothing beyond making you sound like an old coot who refuses to change with the times. It might seem inconsequential, but readers pick up on that kind of nuance whether they realize it or not. It affects the color of the writing and as such it affects how it’s interpreted and understood by the reader.
But maybe that’s just me being pedantic. Here’s where it matters more: “Mr” Obama and “Mr” Romney. OK, fine, you decide you’re not just going with “Obama” and “Romney” for whatever reason. Shouldn’t they be “President” Obama and “Governor” Romney? In what other context is a sitting US president NOT referred to by his title? I find it extremely disrespectful. I’m not a huge fan of politicians holding their titles after they’ve left office (i.e., President Clinton ain’t president any more), so if you don’t want to call Romney “Governor,” fine. But Obama is in office!
It might be a minor, inconsequential detail. But in an age when traditional newspapers are struggling to maintain their presence and importance, details matter.
Posted in Uncategorized